Friday, February 10, 2017

Is Total War Necessary?

I don't think that Total War was necessary and I believable that they could have made them surrender in a different way. Maybe Sherman could have threatened instead of just done it. Maybe they could have tried to burn less land. Maybe they could have burned just Georgia. I don't think that this was a wise choice on Sherman or the Union's part.
Posted by at

7 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:02 AM

    GO CHUCKY!! (I disagree)

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:04 AM

    I agree with you Charlie. There definitely could of been a better strategy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:06 AM

    I agree, that they could have done something different than hurting all those people and doing it so violently.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:12 AM

      IT'S WAR! HOW CAN IT GET LESS VIOLENT!!

      Delete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:11 AM

    I see your point although I disagree, it would be a better idea to threaten it before actually doing it, and it was actually only in Georgia, from Atlanta to Savannah it stayed in Georgia.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:12 AM

    I Agree With You Charlie!

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:16 AM

    IF THEY HAd A SOLDIER ON SOLDIER BATTLE IT RISK MUCH MORE UNION CASUALTIES, LET THE SOUTH BURN!!!

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)