Friday, February 10, 2017

Total War or Siege...

Total war shouldn't of happened and siege shouldn't of happened either in the Civil War. Total war was to destroy all civilian and military resources. Siege was to cut off all supplies from entering an area; forcing surrender. I never think that violence is the answer. They could've figured out a different way of handling it because they could of just surrounded them with the siege but they could still let them have let them have some food.
Posted by at

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:10 AM

    I agree because they are both not good things to do to try and end a war or make the other team surrender

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 8:15 AM

    I agree with you becuase they shouldn't have let the children and civilians starve while under siege.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)